James Earl Hill v. Nevada

953 P.2d 1077 (1998)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

James Earl Hill v. Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court
953 P.2d 1077 (1998)

Facts

James Earl Hill (defendant) was sentenced to death after being found guilty of sexual assault and murder. Hill’s trial attorney testified that the attorney was aware of Hill’s low IQ but that the attorney found Hill to be competent. The attorney stated that Hill assisted in the preparation of Hill’s defense, had no problems communicating, and was capable of discussing case strategy. A psychologist testified during the penalty phase but made no finding that Hill was incompetent. Hill subsequently filed a petition for post-conviction relief, arguing that his trial attorney provided ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to investigate Hill’s competency or raise an insanity defense related to Hill’s low IQ of 68 and his traumatic childhood. As part of the post-conviction motion, Hill was evaluated by two psychiatrists, who both found that Hill understood the nature of his criminal case, had the capacity to assist his attorney, and was in his right mind at the time of the murder. Hill’s post-conviction attorney also testified that Hill understood the charges against him. The lower court denied the petition, and Hill appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership