Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

James H. Rice Co. v. McJohn

Illinois Supreme Court
244 Ill. 264 (1910)


Facts

Joseph McJohn (defendant) owed money to James H. Rice Co. (Rice) (plaintiff). Rice sued and obtained a judgment in the amount of $1801.60 against McJohn on September 17, 1902. Before the judgment was issued, on August 7, 1902, McJohn transferred his only property, a piece of real estate with a three-story brick building on it, to Edward McJohn (Edward). The conveyance purported that the sale was for $1, but no consideration was paid. Rather Edward held the property in trust for McJohn, so that McJohn could avoid Rice’s judgment. McJohn failed to satisfy the judgment, despite the sheriff’s requests, and Rice sued McJohn and Edward and requested that the conveyance be set aside as fraudulent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 239,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.