James M. v. Hawaii Department of Education

803 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (2011)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

James M. v. Hawaii Department of Education

United States District Court for the District of Hawaii
803 F. Supp. 2d 1150 (2011)

Facts

James M. was a 19-year-old student with autism who had associated neurological, motor, and speech deficits. James had attended both public and private schools and had received speech and occupational therapies as well as other related services. James’s public school district provided James and his mother (plaintiff) with a proposed individual education plan (IEP) for James to return to the public school. The IEP provided for fewer hours of speech therapy than James had been receiving at his private school and a reduction in James’s access to direct occupational therapy. The district provided evidence, however, that the IEP was constructed to sufficiently address James’s individualized needs, including that the services offered would match or exceed those that James had previously received when he had been enrolled in the public school. James’s mother filed a request to challenge the IEP with the Hawaii Department of Education, alleging that the IEP was deficient to meet James’s educational needs. The hearing officer concluded that the IEP offered James a free appropriate public education (FAPE) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). James’s mother appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kobayashi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership