James River Insurance Company v. Rapid Funding, LLC

658 F.3d 1207 (2011)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

James River Insurance Company v. Rapid Funding, LLC

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
658 F.3d 1207 (2011)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Play video

Facts

Rapid Funding, LLC (plaintiff) owned a dilapidated apartment building destroyed by fire. When it submitted an insurance claim to its carrier, James River Insurance Company (defendant), for the full $3 million of coverage, the insurer denied it, claiming that before the fire the building was worth less than $0. Rapid Funding sued the insurer in federal court and used its principal, Andrew Miller, to testify about the building’s value. The trial court allowed Mr. Miller to testify as a lay witness, not as an expert. Mr. Miller gave his opinion based on cost estimates to renovate versus reconstruct each apartment, adjusted for depreciation, and a report prepared by Anderson Group, an outside expert. The trial court awarded Rapid Funding over $5 million and the insurer appealed. The insurer argued the court erred in admitting Miller’s testimony because (1) it did not qualify as helpful lay-opinion testimony admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 701(b); and (2) it was Rule 702 expert testimony.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Matheson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 807,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership