James River Insurance Company v. Rapid Funding, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
658 F.3d 1207 (2011)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Rapid Funding, LLC (plaintiff) owned a dilapidated apartment building destroyed by fire. When it submitted an insurance claim to its carrier, James River Insurance Company (defendant), for the full $3 million of coverage, the insurer denied it, claiming that before the fire the building was worth less than $0. Rapid Funding sued the insurer in federal court and used its principal, Andrew Miller, to testify about the building’s value. The trial court allowed Mr. Miller to testify as a lay witness, not as an expert. Mr. Miller gave his opinion based on cost estimates to renovate versus reconstruct each apartment, adjusted for depreciation, and a report prepared by Anderson Group, an outside expert. The trial court awarded Rapid Funding over $5 million and the insurer appealed. The insurer argued the court erred in admitting Miller’s testimony because (1) it did not qualify as helpful lay-opinion testimony admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 701(b); and (2) it was Rule 702 expert testimony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matheson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 807,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.