Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

James v. Illinois

493 U.S. 307 (1990)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

James v. Illinois

United States Supreme Court

493 U.S. 307 (1990)

Play video

Facts

Darryl James (defendant) was a murder suspect. When the police found James the day after the murder, he was in a beauty parlor getting his hair curled and dyed black. The police took James into custody, and James told the officers that his hair was previously reddish-brown and straight. He stated that he dyed his hair black “to change his appearance.” At a pretrial hearing, the trial court ruled these statements inadmissible as the fruit of a warrantless arrest that violated James’s Fourth Amendment rights. At trial, eyewitnesses for the prosecution identified James as the shooter, testified that the shooter had reddish hair, and testified that they had seen James with reddish hair prior to the shooting. James did not testify. Jewel Henderson, a family friend, testified in James’s defense. Henderson stated that on the day of the shooting, James’s hair was black. The prosecution sought to impeach Henderson’s testimony with James’s statements to the officers when he was arrested. The trial court admitted James’s statements for impeachment purposes. James was convicted. The Illinois Appellate Court reversed, finding that the exclusionary rule did not allow illegally obtained statements to be used for impeaching a defense witness’s testimony. The Illinois Supreme Court reversed and reinstated James’s conviction, finding that the impeachment exception to the exclusionary rule applied to Henderson’s testimony. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)

Dissent (Kennedy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership