James v. Valtierra
United States Supreme Court
402 U.S. 137 (1971)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
The United States Housing Act of 1937 ultimately established loan and grant programs for states for low-rent housing developments. In 1950, California voters adopted Article XXXIV of the state constitution related to low-cost public housing. Article XXXIV required the approval of a majority of local voters before a low-rent housing project could be developed, constructed, or acquired by any state public body. Effectively, all low-income housing developments were subject to a mandatory local referendum. In San Jose, California, and San Mateo County, a number of low-cost housing proposals were defeated in referendums. Citizens of San Jose and San Mateo County who were eligible for low-cost public housing (plaintiffs) brought suit, seeking a declaration that Article XXXIV was unconstitutional because the referendum requirement violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, among other claims. The district court found that Article XXXIV was unconstitutional. The judgment was appealed to the United States Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
Dissent (Marshall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 814,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.