Jankovitz v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

421 F.3d 649 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jankovitz v. Des Moines Independent Community School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
421 F.3d 649 (2005)

Facts

The Des Moines Independent Community School District (school district) (defendant) adopted an early-retirement incentive program that provided financial incentives for school-district employees to voluntarily retire before age 65. However, employees over age 65 were ineligible for any of the program’s benefits. Robert Jankovitz and five other current or former school-district employees (employees) (plaintiffs) were over the age of 65. The employees sued the school district in federal district court, claiming that the early-retirement incentive program violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Specifically, the employees argued that the program discriminated against employees based on age because a 65-year-old employee could not get any benefits under the program, but a younger, 64-year-old employee with the same job responsibilities and the same years of service could get benefits. In response, the school district claimed that its program was lawful because a safe-harbor provision in the ADEA allowed voluntary, early-retirement incentive plans that were consistent with the ADEA’s purpose. The district court ruled that (1) the school district’s program was voluntary but (2) the program’s age requirement violated the ADEA’s purpose of preventing employers from withholding benefits from an older worker based solely on the worker’s age. The district court granted judgment to the employees, and the school district appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McMillian, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 816,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership