Jankovitz v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
421 F.3d 649 (2005)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
The Des Moines Independent Community School District (school district) (defendant) adopted an early-retirement incentive program that provided financial incentives for school-district employees to voluntarily retire before age 65. However, employees over age 65 were ineligible for any of the program’s benefits. Robert Jankovitz and five other current or former school-district employees (employees) (plaintiffs) were over the age of 65. The employees sued the school district in federal district court, claiming that the early-retirement incentive program violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Specifically, the employees argued that the program discriminated against employees based on age because a 65-year-old employee could not get any benefits under the program, but a younger, 64-year-old employee with the same job responsibilities and the same years of service could get benefits. In response, the school district claimed that its program was lawful because a safe-harbor provision in the ADEA allowed voluntary, early-retirement incentive plans that were consistent with the ADEA’s purpose. The district court ruled that (1) the school district’s program was voluntary but (2) the program’s age requirement violated the ADEA’s purpose of preventing employers from withholding benefits from an older worker based solely on the worker’s age. The district court granted judgment to the employees, and the school district appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McMillian, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 816,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.