Janson v. LegalZoom.com, Inc.
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri
802 F. Supp. 2d 1053 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Todd Janson and others (plaintiffs) who purchased services from LegalZoom.com, Inc. (defendant), brought suit against LegalZoom for unauthorized practice of law. LegalZoom’s website enabled users to answer a few questions and, based on those answers, the website produced a legal document such as a will or a business-formation document. LegalZoom employees, including nonlawyers, reviewed customers’ answers for completeness, inconsistencies, and spelling and grammatical errors. If there was an issue with the submission, a nonlawyer employee would contact the customer for clarification. Additionally, nonlawyer employees provided customer service to customers. The website did not provide legal advice. LegalZoom asserted that its website merely provided access to software that created legal documents and was akin to a “self-help kit.” LegalZoom argued that the customers filled out the forms themselves. Janson moved for summary judgment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laughrey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.