Jarmuth v. Aldridge
Illinois Appellate Court
747 N.E.2d 1014 (2001)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Kenneth Aldridge, through his business KWA Leasing, Inc. (KWA) (defendants), owned a private vintage aircraft known as a Vultee. Aldridge hired an aircraft mechanic licensed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to look at a possible fuel problem with the Vultee. The mechanic discovered a problem with the carburetor and, with Aldridge’s approval, sent the carburetor to an outside company to be overhauled. The mechanic then reinstalled the repaired carburetor, conducted the annual inspection for the Vultee, and certified the Vultee as airworthy. A few days later, Michael Garofalo was piloting the Vultee with a passenger when the carburetor float malfunctioned. The Vultee crashed, killing both occupants. As the administrator of Garofalo’s estate, Jeffrey Jarmuth (plaintiff) sued Aldridge and KWA. Jarmuth claimed that (1) as the Vultee’s owners, Aldridge and KWA had a duty to personally inspect the Vultee to determine its airworthiness, (2) Aldridge and KWA had negligently failed to fulfill this duty, and (3) this negligence was the cause of the crash and Garofalo’s death. Aldridge and KWA moved for summary judgment, arguing that having an FAA-certified mechanic inspect the aircraft had fulfilled their duty to ensure that the Vultee was airworthy. The district court found that the owner of a private aircraft could rely on a mechanic’s finding of airworthiness and dismissed Jarmuth’s negligence claim. Jarmuth appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Brien, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.