Jarvis Clark Company v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
733 F.2d 873 (1984)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Jarvis Clark Company (Jarvis) (plaintiff) imported tippler hoppers—mining cars that were used to haul ores and waste from mines. The United States Customs Service (customs) (defendant) classified the cars as “[r]ailroad and railway rolling stock” under heading 690.15 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Jarvis protested the classification, arguing that the cars should have been characterized as “other excavating, levelling, boring, and extracting machinery . . . for earth, minerals, or ores” under TSUS heading 664.08—a tariff classification carrying a lower duty rate. Upon customs’ denial of Jarvis’s protest, Jarvis challenged the denial before the United States Court of International Trade. The court ruled in favor of customs, holding that Jarvis had not met its burden of proving the correctness of its proposed classification. The court, however, did not independently consider the correctness of customs’ classification. Jarvis appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Wisdom, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.