Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Jean Alexander Cosmetics v. L'Oreal USA

458 F.3d 244 (2006)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 32,100+ case briefs...

Jean Alexander Cosmetics v. L'Oreal USA

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

458 F.3d 244 (2006)

Facts

L’Oreal USA (defendant) first used its “Shades EQ” mark in 1988. In 1992, L’Oreal started using a “modernized version” of the mark. Jean Alexander Cosmetics (Jean Alexander) (plaintiff) began using its “EQ System” mark in 1990; it registered the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in 1993. In 1996, L’Oreal attempted to register its modernized mark. The examiner rejected L’Oreal’s application based on a likelihood of confusion with the EQ System mark. L’Oreal petitioned the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to cancel Jean Alexander’s mark, arguing that L’Oreal’s modernized mark was legally equivalent to the 1988 version and therefore had priority over Jean Alexander’s mark. Both parties litigated the matter extensively. Ultimately, the TTAB denied L’Oreal’s petition because its modernized mark was not equivalent to the original and, consequently, did not have priority. The TTAB also held, “solely for the sake of completeness,” that there was no likelihood of confusion between L’Oreal’s modernized mark and Jean Alexander’s mark. L’Oreal applied to register its modernized mark, which Jean Alexander opposed. The PTO registered the mark, and the TTAB ruled that issue preclusion prevented Jean Alexander’s opposition. Jean Alexander sued L’Oreal in federal court for trademark infringement. The court dismissed the suit based on issue preclusion. Jean Alexander appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rendell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 582,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 582,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 32,100 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 582,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 32,100 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership