Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Jean Alexander Cosmetics v. L'Oreal USA

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
458 F.3d 244 (2006)


Facts

L’Oreal USA (defendant) first used its “Shades EQ” mark in 1988. In 1992, L’Oreal started using a “modernized version” of the mark. Jean Alexander Cosmetics (Jean Alexander) (plaintiff) began using its “EQ System” mark in 1990; it registered the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) in 1993. In 1996, L’Oreal attempted to register its modernized mark. The examiner rejected L’Oreal’s application based on a likelihood of confusion with the EQ System mark. L’Oreal petitioned the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) to cancel Jean Alexander’s mark, arguing that L’Oreal’s modernized mark was legally equivalent to the 1988 version and therefore had priority over Jean Alexander’s mark. Both parties litigated the matter extensively. Ultimately, the TTAB denied L’Oreal’s petition because its modernized mark was not equivalent to the original and, consequently, did not have priority. The TTAB also held, “solely for the sake of completeness,” that there was no likelihood of confusion between L’Oreal’s modernized mark and Jean Alexander’s mark. L’Oreal applied to register its modernized mark, which Jean Alexander opposed. The PTO registered the mark, and the TTAB ruled that issue preclusion prevented Jean Alexander’s opposition. Jean Alexander sued L’Oreal in federal court for trademark infringement. The court dismissed the suit based on issue preclusion. Jean Alexander appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Rendell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.