Jenkins v. Landmark Mortgage Corp. of Virginia

696 F. Supp. 1089 (1988)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jenkins v. Landmark Mortgage Corp. of Virginia

United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
696 F. Supp. 1089 (1988)

AR

Facts

On August 25, 1987, Jenkins (plaintiff) received a mortgage from First American Mortgage and Loan Association of Virginia. Houff was the agent who closed the mortgage for First American. During closing, Houff gave Jenkins the required “Notice of Right to Cancel” but failed to give Jenkins copies of disclosures required under the Truth in Lending Act. Orally, Houff told Jenkins that Jenkins had a right to rescind the agreement if the lender received notice by August 28 at midnight. Houff then mailed the required disclosures to Jenkins, along with a cover letter that reiterated the midnight rescission deadline and stated that Jenkins would be liable for some fees even if Jenkins rescinded the loan. Jenkins did nothing, and Landmark Mortgage Corporation of Virginia (defendant) bought the loan. Jenkins defaulted and informed Landmark that she wished to rescind on June 21, 1988. Landmark started foreclosure proceedings against Jenkins’s home. Jenkins sued, arguing that she had effectively rescinded her agreement. Landmark responded that the rescission period had already passed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Michael, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership