Jenkins v. National Board of Medical Examiners

2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2660 (2009)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jenkins v. National Board of Medical Examiners

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 2660 (2009)

Facts

Kirk Jenkins (plaintiff) was a medical student diagnosed with a reading disorder, which impaired his ability to process written words and read at the same speed as most adults. Jenkins filed a lawsuit under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) (defendant), seeking an injunction to force the NBME to allow him time and a half to complete Step One of the US Medical Licensing Examination. Jenkins argued that his reading disorder limited a major life activity, entitling him to protection under the ADA. The district court, relying on the United States Supreme Court case Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams, dismissed Jenkins’s complaint, ruling that he was not disabled under the ADA because his disorder did not substantially impair his ability to read. Jenkins appealed. While Jenkins’s case was pending, Congress passed an amendment to the ADA repudiating the Supreme Court’s holding in Toyota and allowed for a broad interpretation of the term “disability.”

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership