Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Jennings v. Hurt

Supreme Court of New York
N.Y. L.J., Oct. 4 1989, at 24


Facts

Sandra Jennings (plaintiff) and William Hurt (defendant) lived together from 1981 until 1984. Hurt was married when they met. In the spring of 1982, Jennings became pregnant with the couple’s child. They began negotiating a contract to provide financial support for their living arrangements and their child. In September 1982, Hurt asked his wife for a divorce because of his and Jennings’ impending baby. He told Jennings that the divorce did not mean he was committing himself to marry her. The divorce became final on December 3, 1982. Throughout their relationship, Hurt expressed to Jennings his dissatisfaction with the institution of marriage. From October 31, 1982 to January 10, 1983, Jennings and Hurt lived together in South Carolina while Hurt was filming “The Big Chill.” Their relationship was tempestuous during that time. At one point—the date is unclear—Hurt allegedly called Jennings’ obstetrician to ask about his “wife.” Otherwise, Hurt and Jennings did not put themselves forward as husband and wife in any manner. On December 27, 1982, Hurt signed a “Paternity Acknowledgement.” That same day, the couple got into an argument during which Hurt allegedly told Jennings that their arrangement did not matter because he considered themselves married “in the eyes of God” and “more married than married people.” Jennings later sued Hurt in a New York court to confirm that the couple had entered into a common-law marriage in South Carolina. The trial court considered her claim.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Silbermann, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.