Logourl black

Jennings v. Pittsburgh Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
202 A.2d 51 (1964)


Facts

Jennings and Cantor (plaintiffs), a real estate broker and real estate investment counselor and attorney, entered into an agreement with Pittsburgh Mercantile Co. (Mercantile) (defendant) to solicit bids for the purchase of real estate. Jennings met with Egmore, Mercantile’s vice president and treasurer-comptroller, and Stern, Mercantile’s financial consultant, to discuss Mercantile’s finances and plans. This was an unusual transaction for Mercantile. At the meeting, Egmore conveyed that he was a member of Mercantile’s executive committee, which controlled Mercantile; the executive committee would determine whether the company would accept any offers solicited by Jennings; and the approval by the board of directors of an offer would be automatic. Egmore outlined preliminary terms of an acceptable offer and promised Jennings a commission upon success in bringing in an acceptable offer. Jennings brought in an offer close to the acceptable terms and Stern informed Jennings the executive committee had agreed to the deal. However, within a week, Egmore informed Jennings the offer had been rejected and refused to pay Jennings his commission. Jennings and Cantor filed suit in assumpsit to recover the commission. The case went to trial and the jury returned a verdict for Jennings. Mercantile moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but the trial court denied the motion.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Holding and Reasoning (Cohen, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, start your 7-day free trial of Quimbee for Law Students.

Here's why 77,000 law students rely on our case briefs:

  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners not other law students.
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet.
  • 10,692 briefs - keyed to 140 casebooks.
  • Uniform format for every case brief.
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language.
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions.
  • Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
  • Top-notch customer support.
Start Your Free Trial Now