From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
Jeremiah J. v. Dakota D.
Nebraska Supreme Court
843 N.W.2d 820 (2014)
Jeremiah J. (plaintiff) knew that Dakota D. (defendant) was pregnant, but Dakota told Jeremiah that he was not the child’s father. However, when Dakota put the unborn child up for adoption a few months later, she listed Jeremiah as the child’s biological father. The adoption agency contacted Jeremiah, who said that he opposed the adoption and wanted custody of the child. Jeremiah began saving money from his job earnings to care for the child. When the child was born, Dakota hid the child’s birth from Jeremiah, deliberately trying to keep Jeremiah from timely objecting to the adoption. Jeremiah learned about the child’s birth and objected, seeking custody of the child. Dakota argued that Jeremiah’s consent was not necessary for the adoption because Jeremiah (1) had not provided any financial assistance to the child and (2) would be an unfit parent. Dakota claimed that Jeremiah smoked marijuana daily, had snorted crack cocaine, and had abused her. Dakota also pointed to Jeremiah’s criminal record on small matters and his unstable job history. In response, Jeremiah denied the drug-use and abuse claims. Jeremiah also provided evidence that he had held the same full-time job at $12.50 per hour for the past seven months and that he had saved up $2,000 to care for the child. Finally, Jeremiah argued that he would have provided financial assistance for the child already, but Dakota’s refusal to interact with him made it difficult for him to do so. The county court found that Jeremiah’s version of events was more credible and ruled that his consent was needed before the child could be adopted. Dakota appealed the ruling.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McCormack, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.