Jeri-Jo Knitwear, Inc. v. Club Italia, Inc.

94 F. Supp. 2d 457 (2000)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
J
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jeri-Jo Knitwear, Inc. v. Club Italia, Inc.

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
94 F. Supp. 2d 457 (2000)

  • Written by Tammy Boggs, JD

Facts

In 1999, the Southern District of New York issued a consent judgment prohibiting Sixty S.p.A. and Sixty U.S.A. (collectively, Sixty) (defendants) from advertising or promoting apparel that bore the trademark ENERGIE (Energie) within the United States. The Energie trademark was registered and owned in the United States by Jeri-Jo Knitwear Inc. (plaintiff). In numerous other countries worldwide, Sixty owned the Energie trademark and right to sell Energie-branded clothing. Sixty manufactured, advertised, and sold high-end denim apparel under several labels, including Energie. Sixty operated three websites, whose servers were in Italy: www.misssixty.com, www.sixty.net, and www.energie.it. The first two websites (the Sixty sites) displayed various products for sale but did not display Energie products. The Sixty sites included a link to www.energie.it that displayed Sixty’s line of Energie apparel. Each site was accessible to American and international users, but American users were more accustomed to accessing sites ending in “.com” and “.net” and less accustomed to using sites ending in “.it.” In 2000, Jeri-Jo Knitwear requested the court find Sixty in contempt of the consent judgment based on Sixty’s websites.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Owen, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Conflict of Laws

Key Terms