Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 527, 115 S.Ct. 1043, 130 L.Ed.2d 1024, 1995 AMC 913 (1995)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. (Great Lakes) (plaintiff) was hired by the City of Chicago to replace pilings in the Chicago River, a navigable waterway. Great Lakes completed this work by using a crane on a barge floating in the river to pull up old pilings and drive in new ones, in a location in the river under which a tunnel ran. Months later, the walls of that tunnel breached, and an eddy formed in the river, causing water to cascade down into the tunnel and then into the basements of numerous buildings. Numerous claims were filed in state court against Great Lakes and the city as a result of the flooding. Great Lakes brought a suit in federal court, seeking to assert federal admiralty jurisdiction over the matter and seeking protection under an admiralty liability-limitation statute. The city and Jerome Grubart, Inc., a state-court plaintiff (defendants) filed a motion to dismiss Great Lakes’ claim for lack of admiralty jurisdiction. The court granted the motion, but the court of appeals reversed. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Souter, J.)
Concurrence (Thomas, J.)
Concurrence (O’Connor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.