Jessen v. Keystone Savings and Loan Association
California Court of Appeal
142 Cal. App. 3d 454 (1983)
- Written by Daniel Clark, JD
Facts
Ray Jessen (plaintiff) was a real estate developer who developed a complex of condominium units that he intended to sell. Jessen financed the construction with a series of loans from Keystone Savings and Loan Association (Keystone) (defendant) secured by deeds of trust on several condominium units. Specifically, Keystone was the beneficiary of deeds of trust on four units owned by Jessen. Two of those units Jessen had already marketed for sale, including publishing prices. The other two units Jessen held to be personal investments, and Jessen had not marketed those units in any way. Disputes arose between Jessen and Keystone concerning the loans, leading to Jessen suing Keystone and to Keystone beginning foreclosure proceedings on Jessen’s four units. In his suit, Jessen sought both monetary damages and a permanent injunction preventing Keystone’s foreclosure. Jessen sought a preliminary injunction pending the ultimate outcome of the case. The trial court held hearings at which it heard testimony concerning the evidentiary basis for Jessen’s claims. The trial court denied the preliminary injunction, finding that any harm Jessen might suffer from a foreclosure ultimately ruled unlawful could be cured with monetary damages and that Jessen was unlikely to prevail on the merits anyway. Jessen appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Work, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.