Jett v. Municipal Court
California Court of Appeal
177 Cal. App. 3d 664, 223 Cal. Rptr. 111 (1986)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Jean Jett (plaintiff) owned a 50-year-old tortoise, Rocky, for 18 years. Rocky lived in a habitat within a petting zoo owned by Jett. After receiving complaints that Jett was subjecting Rocky to neglect and animal cruelty, the San Diego Humane Society investigated the animal’s living conditions. Upon arrival at the petting zoo, the Humane Society found Rocky with various health issues that indicated poor care. The People of California (the People) charged Jett under Penal Code §§ 597(b) and 597f for subjecting an animal to needless suffering and permitting an animal to be on a street or lot without proper care or attention, respectively. A jury convicted Jett of the charges. Pursuant to § 597f, the Humane Society took ownership of Rocky and maintained a lien for his care. Jett petitioned for the return of Rocky. The trial court (defendant) denied the petition and expressly reserved the Humane Society’s lien. Jett instituted a civil action appealing the trial court’s order. The People argued in support of the trial court’s order, stating that § 599aa authorized the forfeiture of Rocky. In the alternative, the People argued that the forfeiture is akin to parental rights being terminated when the best interest of the child warrants such.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Butler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.