Jew Ho v. Williamson

103 F. 10 (1900)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jew Ho v. Williamson

United States Circuit Court for the Northern District of California
103 F. 10 (1900)

Facts

The San Francisco Board of Health (the board of health) (defendant) passed a resolution that bubonic plague existed in the city and had to be stopped. Government officials acting under this resolution issued rules requiring all people of Chinese descent to be vaccinated with a particular serum if they wanted to leave the city limits. If a person of Chinese descent did not get this particular vaccine, the person was required to stay in specific, quarantined areas within the city limits. Jew Ho (plaintiff) was a San Francisco resident of Chinese descent who lived in a quarantined section of the city. The quarantine lines had been drawn on racial lines, sometimes skirting houses with residents of different races and deliberately including other houses and areas that were occupied by people of Chinese descent. Government officials admitted the quarantine lines were based on a belief that people of Chinese descent were more likely than other races to spread bubonic plague. Jew Ho sued to lift the quarantine lines, arguing that the quarantine was both an abuse of the government’s police powers and a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Morrow, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership