Jewelpak Corp. v. United States

97 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jewelpak Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade
97 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (2000)

Facts

Jewelpak Corp. (Jewelpak) imported plastic and metal presentation boxes used to ship, store, and sell jewelry. The United States Customs Service (customs) classified the boxes as jewelry boxes under subsection 4202.92.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The explanatory notes to heading 4202 stated that jewelry boxes should be suitable for long-term use. Other items listed under heading 4202 included suitcases, briefcases, and musical-instrument cases. Jewelpak challenged the classification, arguing that some of the boxes should be classified as plastic boxes for the conveyance of goods under subheading 3923.10.00 and others as iron or steel boxes under subheading 7310.29.00. Customs argued that because the dictionary definition of jewelry box referred to a box designed to hold jewelry, customs’ classification should have been upheld. Jewelpak argued that the correct classification hinged on whether the boxes were intended to be reused. Customs filed a motion for summary judgment, and Jewelpak cross-moved for summary judgment.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wallach, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership