Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Andrus

687 F.2d 1324 (1982)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Andrus

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
687 F.2d 1324 (1982)

Facts

The Bureau of Indian Affairs, an agency of the Department of the Interior, sold several leases for oil-and-gas drilling on the lands of the Jicarilla Apache Tribe (the tribe) (plaintiff) in the early 1970s. At around the same time, the tribe entered several joint ventures for oil-and-gas development. Several years later, the tribe brought an action against the Secretary of the Interior (the government) (defendant) and various lessees (defendants) in federal district court. The tribe sought a declaration that the nonproducing leases involved in the sales were invalid because the government had failed to comply with required procedures for publishing notice. The tribe also sought a court order for an environmental-impact statement on the producing leases pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The court found that the government had failed to comply with publication procedures but declined to cancel the leases, instead ordering payment of adjusted bonus amounts to the tribe. The court also found that the government had valid defenses of laches and unclean hands, thus defeating the NEPA claim. The tribe appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Holloway, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 819,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 819,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership