JMB Properties Urban Co. v. Paolucci

604 N.E.2d 967 (1992)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

JMB Properties Urban Co. v. Paolucci

Appellate Court of Illinois
604 N.E.2d 967 (1992)

Play video

Facts

Alfred Paolucci (defendant) opened a jewelry store in an Illinois mall in 1978. In November 1984, Barretts Audio and Video Store (Barretts) opened next door to Paolucci’s store. Barretts made considerable noise, making the jewelry store’s walls shake and its display cases vibrate and topple over. The jewelry store’s employees had to wear ear plugs, and its customers complained. In 1985, Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership XIV (Carlyle) (plaintiff) purchased the mall and hired JMB Properties Urban Company (JMB) (plaintiff) to manage it. Also in 1985, at Carlyle’s direction, Barretts insulated the common wall in an attempt to soundproof it, which did not help. The jewelry store lost profits. In August 1986, Paolucci entered into a new six-year lease with Carlyle, requiring Paolucci to operate the jewelry store for the entire term of the lease and refrain from operating any similar business within five miles of the mall. Barretts moved out of the mall in February 1990. However, Paolucci failed to pay rent for July 1990 and abandoned the premises in August 1990, two years before the end of the lease. Paolucci moved to a new business location within five miles of the mall. Carlyle and JMB sued Paolucci for unpaid rent and other damages resulting from Paolucci’s breach of lease. The trial court found Paolucci had been constructively evicted. Carlyle and JMB appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Slater, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 791,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 791,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership