Johannsongs-Publishing Ltd. v. Lovland
United States District Court for the Central District of California
2020 WL 2315805 (2020)
- Written by Liz Nakamura, JD
Facts
Johannsongs-Publishing Ltd. (JP) (plaintiff) owned the copyright to the musical composition for the 1977 song “Soknudur.” JP filed a copyright-infringement action alleging that the song “You Raise Me Up” (“Raise”), written by Rolf Lovland and Brendan Graham (collectively, Lovland) (defendants) was substantially similar to “Soknudur” musically. Lovland challenged and moved for summary judgment, arguing that “Raise” did not copy any protected, original elements from “Soknudur.” Lovland submitted an expert report from musicologist Lawrence Ferrara. The Ferrara report (1) analyzed the musical elements of both “Soknudur” and “Raise” both individually and in combination; (2) analyzed the similarities both “Soknudur” and “Raise” shared with prior art, especially public-domain works and traditional folksongs; and then (3) analyzed the musical similarities that existed between “Soknudur” and “Raise” after filtering out the unprotectable elements derived from prior art. Ferrara concluded that “Raise” did not infringe on the copyright of “Soknudur” because any significant musical similarities between “Soknudur” and “Raise” derived from prior art, meaning that the similarities were grounded in unprotectable elements. Ferrara further concluded that any similarities between “Raise” and “Soknudur” that were not derived from prior art were fragmented, isolated, and insignificant. To counter the Ferrara report, JP submitted its own expert report from Judith Finell. The Finell report found that “Soknudur” and “Raise” were substantially similar, but Finell’s similarity analysis was significantly less comprehensive and failed to filter out unprotectable elements derived from prior art.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Birotte, Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.