From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
John A. Russell Corp. v. Bohlig
Vermont Supreme Court
739 A.2d 1212 (1999)
James Bohlig (plaintiff) was terminated from his job for his dishonest use of company expense accounts. Bohlig then got a new job and entered a three-year contract to work as an officer for the John A. Russell Corporation (Russell) (defendant), a construction company. Bohlig got Russell’s permission to use its employees and equipment to renovate his house. However, the project got larger and more expensive than Bohlig had represented, and Bohlig did not pay Russell for more than $200,000 of the work. Russell terminated Bohlig’s employment contract early. Russell sued Bohlig for the unpaid construction work, and Bohlig sued Russell for unpaid severance. Bohlig argued that the employment contract gave him 12 months of pay and benefits as severance if Russell ended the contract early. However, the severance provision did not apply if Bohlig was terminated for dishonesty in the performance of his job duties, and Russell claimed that was why it had fired Bohlig. At trial, Russell was allowed to present evidence that Bohlig had lost his previous job due to dishonest conduct. The jury awarded Bohlig only around $2800 for his severance claim. Bohlig appealed, arguing that the trial court had erred by allowing evidence of Bohlig’s prior dishonesty. On appeal, Russell claimed that the prior-dishonesty evidence was admissible because it showed context for Bohlig’s job change to Russell, helped establish the dishonesty element of Russell’s defense, and was not unduly prejudicial.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Johnson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 616,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 616,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.