John M. v. Board of Education of Evanston Township High School District 202
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
502 F.3d 708 (2007)

- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
John M. was a sophomore in high school who had Down’s syndrome. John’s parents (plaintiffs) and the Evanston Township High School District 202 (the district) (defendant) had agreed to an individualized education program (IEP) for John in middle school. John’s parents and the district had disagreed, however, about what specific services should be provided to John in high school. John’s parents filed an administrative review of the district’s high-school IEP, alleging that it did not comply with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Once John began high school, he received somewhat different services than he had in middle school. John’s parents alleged that these changes violated the IDEA’s stay-put provision. The hearing officer held for the district. John’s parents appealed in federal district court and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to return to the status quo of the services John had received at the middle school under the stay-put provision, pending the court’s decision. The district court granted the injunction, holding that the district had violated the stay-put provision, and the district appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.