John M. v. Board of Education of Evanston Township High School District 202

502 F.3d 708 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

John M. v. Board of Education of Evanston Township High School District 202

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
502 F.3d 708 (2007)

Facts

John M. was a sophomore in high school who had Down’s syndrome. John’s parents (plaintiffs) and the Evanston Township High School District 202 (the district) (defendant) had agreed to an individualized education program (IEP) for John in middle school. John’s parents and the district had disagreed, however, about what specific services should be provided to John in high school. John’s parents filed an administrative review of the district’s high-school IEP, alleging that it did not comply with the requirements of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Once John began high school, he received somewhat different services than he had in middle school. John’s parents alleged that these changes violated the IDEA’s stay-put provision. The hearing officer held for the district. John’s parents appealed in federal district court and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to return to the status quo of the services John had received at the middle school under the stay-put provision, pending the court’s decision. The district court granted the injunction, holding that the district had violated the stay-put provision, and the district appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ripple, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership