Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

John v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
247 F.3d 1032 (9th Cir. 2001)


Facts

Under the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), 16 U.S.C. § 3111 et seq., subsistence hunting and fishing were given priority over other rights on public land. Under ANILCA, Congress gave Alaska the opportunity to implement regulations consistent with providing priority to subsistence users. However, in 1989, the Supreme Court of Alaska ruled that those preferences were unconstitutional under Alaska’s constitution. The United States Secretary of the Interior (defendant) stepped in shortly after to manage implementation of ANILCA and the priority rights of subsistence users. As part of its regulations, the secretary adopted a narrow definition of “public lands,” which excluded navigable waters. Members of the Ahtna Athabaskan Indians, including Katie John (plaintiff) sued the federal government (defendant) and the Secretary of the Interior, challenging this definition of public lands. John argued that all navigable waters were included within the definition of public lands, because of the navigational servitude. The district court agreed. The United States sought and received an interlocutory appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to determine whether public lands include navigable waters.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Hall, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.