John Walker and Sons, Ltd. v. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
821 F.2d 399 (1987)

- Written by Sarah Holley, JD
Facts
John Walker and Sons, Ltd. (Walker) (plaintiff) sold Scottish-produced whiskey on a worldwide basis under its “Black Label” and “Striding Figure” trademarks. DeMert & Dougherty, Inc. (DeMert) (defendant) was a filler of aerosol cans. Collection 2000 International, Inc.; Blasser Brothers, Inc. S.A.; Joseph Blasser; and Eduardo Blasser (collectively, Collection 2000) (defendants) marketed cosmetics and personal care products. In November 1982, Collection 2000 engaged DeMert to produce approximately 50,000 spray deodorant cans featuring alleged simulations of the Black Label and Striding Figure trademarks. Collection 2000 provided the artwork for the cans, and DeMert filled the spray deodorant cans and shipped them from its place of business in Illinois to a warehouse in Florida. The cans were subsequently sold in Panama and Colombia. Walker filed suit alleging that the placement of artwork on the spray deodorant cans and their shipment and subsequent sale constituted trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act. The trial court granted DeMert’s motion for summary judgment on Walker’s complaint on the ground that DeMert had not placed the allegedly infringing cans in interstate commerce as required under the Lanham Act. Walker appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Coffey, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.