Johnetta v. Municipal Court

218 Cal. App. 3d 1255, 267 Cal. Rptr. 666 (1990)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnetta v. Municipal Court

California Court of Appeal
218 Cal. App. 3d 1255, 267 Cal. Rptr. 666 (1990)

Facts

Johnetta J. (defendant) was charged with felony assault on a peace officer after she assaulted a sheriff’s deputy who was removing Johnetta from a courtroom after she became disruptive. As she was being removed, Johnetta bit the deputy on his arm, penetrating the skin and drawing blood. The San Francisco Sheriff’s Department (department) filed a motion seeking a court order to test Johnetta’s blood for HIV. The department acknowledged that it had no information indicating that Johnetta had HIV. In the motion, the deputy’s doctor stated that there had not been any blood in Johnetta’s mouth when Johnetta bit the deputy but that the bite had created a deep puncture and saliva had been transferred from Johnetta to the deputy. The doctor noted that in such circumstances, HIV transmission was theoretically possible. At a hearing, expert witnesses testified that no cases of HIV transmission by saliva or through biting had been reported and that there was no reason to think that HIV was transmitted through biting. Another expert stated that the risk of HIV transmission through biting was low but that there was not enough information to conclude that HIV could not be transmitted through a bite that broke the skin. The court granted the order to test Johnetta. Johnetta sought a writ of prohibition to prevent the execution of the court order, arguing that the law under which the order had been granted violated her constitutional right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Haning, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership