Johnson v. City of Dallas

155 F.R.D. 581 (1994)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
J
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. City of Dallas

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
155 F.R.D. 581 (1994)

MP

Facts

A group of homeless residents of the City of Dallas representing a class of homeless persons (plaintiffs) sued the City of Dallas, the Dallas Police Department, and members of the Dallas City Council (city) (defendants) to challenge the constitutionality of various city ordinances enacted and enforced to remove homeless persons from public view in the city. Various businesses and homeowners associations (intervenors) motioned to intervene as defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24. The intervenors sought to intervene as-of-right under Rule 24(a) or permissively under Rule 24(b) and, in the alternative, to appear as amici for the sole purpose of submitting briefs. The intervenors argued that they had an economic interest in the litigation that could be adversely affected if they were not allowed to intervene and that the city would not adequately represent their interest.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kendall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Advanced Civil Procedure

Key Terms