From our private database of 15,100+ case briefs...

Johnson v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
78 T.C. 882 (1982)


Facts

Charles Johnson (plaintiff) was a professional basketball player who played in the National Basketball Association (NBA). In 1974, Johnson signed a contract with Presentaciones Musicales, S.A., a Panamanian corporation (PMSA). PMSA acquired the right to Johnson’s services in professional basketball and in return paid Johnson a monthly salary. PMSA licensed its rights and obligations under its agreement with Johnson to EST International Ltd. (EST). EST thereafter paid salary to Johnson and retained 5 percent of the net revenue while remitting the remainder to PMSA. In August 1974, Johnson attempted to enter into a contract with the San Francisco Warriors. The Warriors rejected the idea of a licensing agreement between the Warriors and PMSA and insisted that Johnson sign an NBA Uniform Player Contract. Johnson thus separately signed a Uniform Player Contract with the Warriors. In April 1975, Johnson assigned all his rights in that contract to EST, and all payments due to him from the Warriors under the contract were paid directly to EST. Johnson remained under contract with the Warriors until December 1977, when he was released by the team and cleared waivers. On his federal income tax returns for 1975-1977, Johnson listed no wages or salary and reported only the payments he received from EST as business income. The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (defendant) determined that the entire amount the Warriors paid for Johnson's services during these years counted as income to Johnson and increased Johnson's income for each of the three years by the excess of the amounts paid to EST by the Warriors over the amounts paid to Johnson by EST. The Commissioner thus found that Johnson's income-tax payments from 1975-1977 were deficient and issued statutory notices of deficiency. When Johnson challenged the deficiency notices, the United States Tax Court considered whether the amounts paid by the Warriors for Johnson's services should count as income to Johnson for tax purposes.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fay, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 288,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 15,100 briefs, keyed to 205 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.