Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc.

132 P.3d 825 (2006)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Earnhardt’s Gilbert Dodge, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court
132 P.3d 825 (2006)

Facts

Brenda Johnson (plaintiff) bought a car from Earnhardt’s Gilbert Dodge, Inc. (Earnhardt) (defendant). As part of the same transaction, Johnson, through Earnhardt, bought a service contract from DaimlerChrysler. The service contract contained language indicating that only DaimlerChrysler and Johnson were parties to the contract. However, in the application for the service contract, Earnhardt promised to provide service to Johnson under the contract that DaimlerChrysler would ultimately issue. Johnson had several mechanical problems with the car and attempted to return it to Earnhardt under the service contract. Earnhardt declined Johnson’s attempt, telling her that she should address her request to DaimlerChrysler. Johnson sued Earnhardt seeking to enforce the contract. Johnson submitted an affidavit stating that Earnhardt had told her that she could bring the car to Earnhardt for service under the contract, and that the service warranty was a joint DaimlerChrysler-Earnhardt warranty. The superior court granted Earnhardt’s motion for summary judgment, finding that Earnhardt was not a party to the service contract. The court of appeals reversed. Earnhardt appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ryan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 734,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 734,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership