Johnson v. Elk Lake School District

283 F.3d 138 (2002)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Elk Lake School District

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
283 F.3d 138 (2002)

SC
Play video

Facts

Johnson (plaintiff) was a student in the Elk Lake School District and she began regularly seeing her guidance counselor, Stevens (defendant). She alleged that for about two years thereafter, Stevens sexually harassed and abused her, sending her suggestive correspondences, trying to hug and kiss her, and at one point fondling her breasts and vagina. Johnson brought suit and at trial, she sought to introduce evidence that on a prior occasion Stevens had sexually harassed Radwanski, a teacher’s associate, in another teacher’s office and in the presence of that other teacher. Johnson claimed that Stevens picked Radwanski up over his shoulder and, in doing so, touched Radwanski’s crotch area. Radwanski provided conflicting testimony about how long Stevens’s hand stayed in her crotch and could not prove and did not confirm that the touching was intentional. Although admissible under Rule 415, the district court excluded Radwanski’s testimony based on its prejudicial effect under Rule 403. As a result, the trial court found in favor of Stevens and Johnson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Becker, C.J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership