Johnson v. Hendrickson

71 S.D. 392 (1946)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Hendrickson

South Dakota Supreme Court
71 S.D. 392 (1946)

Facts

Katie Hendrickson was married to Henry Bauman. They had three children—Grace, Arthur, and Vernon (plaintiffs). When Henry died, one-third of his land was devised to Katie and two-ninths to each of the children. Katie later married Karl Hendrickson (defendant). They had two children, Kenneth and Karrol (defendants). During their marriage, Katie and Karl remodeled their house and constructed new buildings, including a barn and a hog house, at a cost of over $9,000. Grace, Arthur, and Vernon were also living on the property during this time and made substantial contributions to the family income. Katie died, leaving one-half of her land to Karl and one-fourth to each of Karl’s sons. Grace, Arthur, and Vernon filed suit, contending that the land could not be physically divided among the various owners and asking that it be sold in one tract. Karl and his sons claimed that they were entitled to compensation from Grace, Arthur, and Vernon for the improvements made on the property. The circuit court ordered that the land be sold and determined that compensating Karl and his sons would be inequitable. Karl and his sons appealed to the state supreme court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Sickel, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership