Johnson v. Jamaica Hospital

467 N.E.2d 502 (1984)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Jamaica Hospital

New York Court of Appeals
467 N.E.2d 502 (1984)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Play video

Facts

The Johnsons (plaintiffs) delivered a baby girl at Jamaica Hospital (defendant). The Johnsons’ daughter was kept for observation, and the mother was discharged. When the mother returned to Jamaica Hospital one week later, it was discovered that their daughter had been abducted. More than four months later, their daughter was returned. In the meantime, the Johnsons had brought suit against Jamaica Hospital for negligent infliction of emotional distress stemming from their daughter’s abduction. The trial court denied the hospital’s motion to dismiss, finding that Jamaica Hospital owed a direct duty to the Johnsons, as parents, to properly care for their child, and that it was foreseeable that any injury to their child would result in emotional distress to the parents. The Appellate Division affirmed, but then certified a question about the correctness of its order to the New York Court of Appeals.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kaye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 830,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership