Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Johnson v. Penny

Supreme Court of South Dakota
779 N.W. 2d 412 (2010)


Facts

Robert Larson (defendant), a farmer, contracted with Michael Johnson (plaintiff) for Johnson to remove rock from Larson’s land in exchange for Johnson receiving the value of the extracted rock. Larson and Johnson subsequently contracted for Johnson to install drain tile in part of Larson’s land, again in exchange for the value of the extracted rock. Johnson removed the rock and installed the drain tile as required by the contracts, extracting 1,100 tons of rock. Johnson only removed between three and five truckloads of the extracted rock. The remainder of the rock was stored on Larson’s land with his permission. All of this occurred in March and April 2005. In August 2006, Larson gave Joel Penny (defendant) permission to remove the rock for free after not having heard from Johnson about the rock despite inquiring about the stockpiles of rock several times and leaving his phone number with Johnson’s bookkeeper. In October 2006, Johnson sent Larson invoices along with a letter reminding Larson of their contract. After not receiving a response, Johnson brought suit against Larson and Penny. The trial court held a hearing on equitable claims and entered a judgment of unjust enrichment against Larson and Penny. The trial court also awarded Johnson the remedy of quantum meruit, or the cost of the benefit. Larson and Penny appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Konenkamp, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.