United States Supreme Court
415 U.S. 361 (1974)
Robison (plaintiff), a conscientious objector during the Vietnam War, made a claim for educational assistance benefits under the Veterans’ Readjustment Act of 1966. The Veterans’ Administrator (defendant) denied his claim because as a conscientious objector, Robison had served only two years of alternative service and had not fulfilled the statutory requirement of “active duty”. Robison filed suit, claiming that the active duty requirement violated his right to equal protection under the Fifth Amendment and right to religious freedom under the First Amendment. The Veterans’ Administrator argued that Robison’s claim should be dismissed under § 211(a) of the Veterans’ Readjustment Act because it bars federal courts from deciding the constitutionality of veterans’ benefits legislation. Section 211(a) states that “the decisions of the Administrator on any question of law or fact under any law administered by the Veterans’ Administration providing benefits to veterans…shall be final and conclusive and no…court of the United States shall have power or jurisdiction to review any such decision…”
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.