Johnson v. Tuff N Rumble Management, Inc.

2000 WL 622612 (2000)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Tuff N Rumble Management, Inc.

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
2000 WL 622612 (2000)

Facts

In 1964, Wardell Quezergue (plaintiff) registered a copyright to the song, It Ain’t My Fault, listing himself and Joseph Johnson (plaintiff) as the song’s sole authors and copyright owners. In 1992, Johnson gave Joe Jones (defendant) power of attorney to act on Johnson’s behalf with respect to use of the song. The power of attorney did not include any language transferring Johnson’s copyright to Jones. Later that year, Jones registered a copyright to It Ain’t My Fault in the name of Smokey Johnson Publishing Co. & Melder Publishing Co. (defendant). The registration certificate stated that ownership of the copyright had been transferred “by written agreement.” The following day, Jones renewed the copyrights to the 1964 and 1992 registrations for It Ain’t My Fault. The plaintiffs sued Jones d/b/a Melder Publishing Co. in a federal court for copyright infringement. In a request for admission sent to Jones’s last known address, the plaintiffs asked Jones to admit or deny the existence of a signed, written assignment of the copyright. The request was returned as “refused,” and Jones claimed he never received it. The plaintiffs later moved for summary judgment. Jones, acting pro se, filed two oppositions and requested sanctions. Jones’s initial opposition included no evidence of a copyright assignment, and his supplemental opposition included a purported assignment from 1964 that was clearly prepared with modern word-processing equipment. Jones’s filings were marked by abusive, disparaging remarks about the plaintiffs and their counsel. The plaintiffs moved for sanctions after providing Jones with 21 days to cure various defects.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Vance, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 810,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership