Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Johnson v. United States

United States Supreme Court
333 U.S. 10 (1948)


Facts

At 7:30 p.m. Seattle narcotics officer Belland received information from a confidential informer, a narcotics user, that certain persons were smoking opium in a hotel. The informer, after returning to the hotel, said that he could smell burning opium in the hallway. Belland and four narcotics agents, all of whom were experienced in narcotics work, went to the hotel between 8:30 and 9 p.m. All agents recognized the unmistakably strong odor of opium, which led them to Room 1, whose occupant(s) was then unknown to the officers. The officers knocked on the door, and, when asked who was there, responded “Lieutenant Belland.” After a short delay, Johnson (defendant) opened the door. When told that the officer wanted to talk to her, Johnson “stepped back acquiescently and admitted us.” Asked about the opium smell, Johnson denied that there was such a smell. She was then told, “I want you to consider yourself under arrest because we are going to search the room.” She did not consent to the search. In the subsequent search, opium and a still-warm smoking apparatus were found, indicating recent use. The district court refused to suppress this information, and Johnson was convicted of having violated federal narcotics laws. The court of appeals affirmed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 220,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.