Johnson v. Virginia

373 U.S. 61 (1963)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnson v. Virginia

United States Supreme Court
373 U.S. 61 (1963)

  • Written by Noah Lewis, JD

Facts

Ford T. Johnson, Jr. (plaintiff), a Black man, sat in a Richmond traffic-court section reserved for Whites. The bailiff asked Johnson to move, and he refused. The judge then summoned Johnson and told him to move to the Black section on the other side of the aisle. Johnson then stood in front of the counsel table with his arms folded, stating that he preferred to stand and would not comply with the order. The judge again directed Johnson to be seated in the Black section. Johnson caused no disturbance and was arrested for contempt. Johnson was convicted of contempt of the Traffic Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia. Johnson appealed, and the conviction was upheld. The Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia declined to review the case, refusing to grant a writ of error because it found the judgment appealed from to be plainly right. Johnson petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari, which the court granted.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership