Johnston v. Johnston

465 A.2d 436 (1983)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Johnston v. Johnston

Maryland Court of Appeals
465 A.2d 436 (1983)

Play video

Facts

J. Edward Johnston Jr. (plaintiff) filed for divorce from his wife, Helen Johnston (defendant). Prior to the filing, Edward and Helen each obtained independent counsel and negotiated a settlement agreement in contemplation of their divorce to provide for the support and maintenance of Helen and their children, as well as the transfer of property interests and the creation of various trusts. The agreement was offered into evidence at the divorce hearing and incorporated into the subsequent divorce decree. A non-merger clause in the agreement provided that, notwithstanding the incorporation, the agreement was not to be merged in the decree but rather was intended to survive the judgment and be binding upon the Johnstons. Several years later, Edward filed a petition to set aside and void the agreement based on the claim that Edward was not mentally competent to sign the document at the time of execution. Helen filed a motion to strike Edward’s petition, arguing that their children were necessary parties to the action due to the children’s reliance upon the terms in the agreement. Additionally, Helen sought clarification of Edward’s mental incapacity claim. The trial court granted Helen’s motion to strike and held that Edward had failed to show that the agreement was based on fraud, mistake, or irregularity, as required by state law. Edward appealed. The intermediate appellate court affirmed. The Maryland Court of Appeals granted certiorari to review.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Couch, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership