Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Joint Tribal Council of the Passamaquoddy Tribe v. Morton

United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
528 F.2d 370 (1975)


Facts

The Passamaquoddy Indian Tribe (Passamaquoddy) (plaintiff), located in Maine, had numerous dealings with the State of Maine, but little communication or interaction with the federal government. The Passamaquoddy was never the subject of federal treaty or federal law. In the 1970s, a dispute arose between the Passamaquoddy and the State of Maine, which had taken Passamaquoddy land. The Passamaquoddy claimed that in taking the land, the State of Maine had violated the Nonintercourse Act (Act), 25 U.S.C. § 177, which prohibits the purchase of land from Indian tribes unless the purchase is made by treaty or convention under the United States Constitution. The Passamaquoddy asked the United States, through the Secretary of the Interior (United States) (defendant), to sue the State of Maine on behalf of the Passamaquoddy. The Passamaquoddy claimed that the Act created a fiduciary relationship between the United States and the Passamaquoddy and that the United States had a duty to sue on behalf of the Passamaquoddy for violations of the Act. The United States determined that it had no fiduciary relationship with the Passamaquoddy and refused to bring the action. The district court disagreed. The district court held that the United States did have a fiduciary relationship with the Passamaquoddy, despite the absence of federal treaty and the fact that the Passamaquoddy was not a tribe recognized by the United States. The United States appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Campbell, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.