Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Jole v. Bredbenner

Oregon Court of Appeals
768 P.2d 433 (1989)


Facts

Fred and Betty Bredbenner (defendants) rented a residence from Dorris Jole (plaintiff) on a month-to-month basis. However, the Bredbenners missed a number of rental payments, ultimately owing $4,400 in missed payments. In August 1984, Fred Bredbenner met with Jole and her husband regarding the missed payments. Mr. Jole told Fred that the Bredbenners would need to pay at least $25 a month toward the debt, in addition to their monthly rent. Afterwards, Jole sent the Bredbenners a letter laying out the agreement they had reached. The letter stated that: (1) the rent was due by the 23rd of each month, the original due date, (2) at least, but preferably more than, $25 would be paid each month toward the debt, (3) the Bredbenners would try to pay their rent from the paycheck they received on the 5th of each month, and (4) any late payments would result in eviction. For the next six months, the Bredbenners made regular payments on the debt. Then the Bredbenners told Jole that they were moving. Jole demanded full payment of the remaining debt plus interest. The Bredbenners refused, saying that, as long they made monthly $25 payments on the debt, the August 1984 agreement meant Jole could not make the full balance due. Jole sued. The trial court ruled in favor of the Bredbenners. Jole appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Deits, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.