Jones v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
224 F.3d 518 (2000)
- Written by Penny Ellison, JD
Facts
The City of Lakeland (city) (defendant) had been discharging contaminated and untreated sewage and other hazardous substances into Oliver Creek for many years. The State of Tennessee (state), through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, had initiated an action to enforce the requirements of the city’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Despite the state enforcement action, the city continued to discharge impermissible amounts of sewage and other toxic substances into Oliver Creek. During this pendency of the enforcement action, the state waived countless NPDES violation notices and extended and waived compliance deadlines in numerous instances, imposing only token penalties. Ten years after the filing of the state’s enforcement action, Rudolph Jones (plaintiff) brought an action against the city, alleging that the city’s discharges in violation of the permit persisted. The district court ruled that Jones was barred from pursuing the action because the city was diligently prosecuting an action to require compliance. Four orders had been entered into between the city and the state, the last of which required the city to come into full compliance with its NPDES permit. The last order also required the payment of a fine. Although the Sixth Circuit initially affirmed the district court’s decision, it voted to rehear the case en banc.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Krupansky, J.)
Dissent (Norris, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.