Jones v. Clinton

990 F. Supp. 657 (1998)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Jones v. Clinton

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
990 F. Supp. 657 (1998)

Play video

Facts

In 1991, Arkansas Governor William Clinton (defendant) allegedly inappropriately touched and made offensive comments to Paula Jones (plaintiff) while in a hotel room in Little Rock, Arkansas. Jones alleged that she was told by Danny Ferguson, a state police officer, that Clinton wanted to see her in his hotel room. According to Jones, after she arrived in the room, the pair engaged in small talk, during which Clinton mentioned being friends with Jones’s superior at the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission (AIDC). Clinton then unexpectedly took Jones’s hand and pulled her toward him. Jones retreated, but Clinton followed, making statements about her appearance. Clinton then put his hand on Jones’s leg and bent down to kiss her neck. Jones again retreated, telling Clinton that she was not that kind of girl. Jones moved to sit on a couch near the door. Clinton then sat down and exposed his genitals to Jones. Jones told Clinton that she had to go, and Clinton responded that he would not want to make her do anything she did not want to. As Jones was leaving, Clinton told Jones, “You are smart. Let’s keep this between ourselves.” Jones told friends about the incident but did not report it to the police or her supervisors. She continued to work at AIDC, regularly delivering documents to the governor’s office without objection. Nineteen months later, Jones left AIDC and relocated for her husband’s job. Later, once Clinton was president of the United States, Jones sued Clinton and Ferguson, asserting multiple claims. One claim against Clinton was a state tort claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). After the Supreme Court ruled that presidential immunity did not insulate Clinton from suit, Clinton and Ferguson both moved for summary judgment in the district court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wright, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership