Jones v. Hardy
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
727 F.2d 1524, 220 U.S.P.Q. 1021 (1984)
- Written by Eric Miller, JD
Facts
Robert Jones (plaintiff) secured a patent on a method for casting concrete panels using a molded plastic sheet. The patent was licensed to Labrado, Inc. (plaintiff). Jones and Labrado brought suit against Alexander Hardy (defendant) and Vefo, Inc. (defendant) for patent infringement and unfair trade practices. At trial in federal district court, Jones emphasized the releasability (or strippability) of the plastic sheet as an advantage over previous methods in which the removal of the sheet was much more time-consuming. The court’s analysis focused on this advantage and found it to be obvious, thus invalidating the patent. Jones and Vefo appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Markey, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.