Jones v. State
Supreme Court of Indiana
589 N.E.2d 241 (1992)
The victim and her foster mother shared a home with Jerry L. Jones (defendant), Jones’s wife, and Jones’s child. One night, Jones entered the victim’s bedroom and asked her to have sexual intercourse with him. She refused his request, and Jones asked again. The victim repeated her refusal to have sex with Jones, and he asked her a third time. Although the victim did not expressly refuse his third request, she did not consent to have intercourse with Jones. Nonetheless, Jones had intercourse with her. At trial, the victim testified that she did not cry out for help while Jones was having sex with her because she was afraid of Jones. The trial court convicted Jones of rape. He appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed his conviction. Jones sought review from the state supreme court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Shepard, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.