Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Jones v. Swanson

341 F.3d 723 (2003)

Case BriefQ&ARelatedOptions
From our private database of 22,600+ case briefs...

Jones v. Swanson

United States Appeals Court for the Eighth Circuit

341 F.3d 723 (2003)

Facts

Donna Jones, a nurse in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, married Richard Jones (plaintiff) in 1981. In September 1998, Mrs. Jones saw an old flame, Todd Swanson (defendant), for the first time in 20 years. Swanson, an orthopedic surgeon in Las Vegas, returned to Sioux Falls to visit his father in the hospital. Mrs. Jones and Swanson met the next day, at which point she expressed dissatisfaction with her marriage despite continuing to love her husband “as the father of her children.” The pair kissed and told one another that it had been a mistake to end their relationship years ago. After the meeting in Sioux Falls, Swanson and Mrs. Jones commenced a long-distance affair. In November, Mrs. Jones told her husband that she was thinking of divorce. Swanson visited Sioux Falls over Thanksgiving, and Mr. Jones suspected the affair. Mrs. Jones admitted to it. Mrs. Jones and Swanson jointly participated in counseling to discuss their relationship and then went on a 10-day European vacation together. After returning from Europe, Swanson and Mrs. Jones participated in individual and joint counseling in preparation for a future together. In January, Mrs. Jones moved out of the marital home. She saw Swanson that month, and he suggested they stop seeing each other. In February, however, he again expressed his love for her. In April, Mrs. Jones moved back in with her husband, and Mr. and Mrs. Jones participated in counseling together to try and fix their marriage. Later that month, however, Swanson came to town. Mrs. Jones contacted him, and they slept together. In May, Mr. Jones sued Swanson for alienation of affection. Mr. Jones then filed for divorce. A jury in the trial against Swanson rendered a verdict in Mr. Jones’s favor and awarded him compensatory damages of $450,000 and punitive damages of $500,000. Swanson appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bye, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 519,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 22,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions and answers

Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 519,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 22,600 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership