Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd.
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
828 F.2d 1482 (1987)
- Written by Eric Cervone, LLM
Facts
Jordache (plaintiff) was one of the largest blue-jeans manufacturers in the United States. Jordache owned several registered trademarks, including the name Jordache. Two common ways Jordache used the mark on its product included: (1) the word Jordache in script and (2) the word Jordache in block letters superimposed over a horse head. Hogg Wyld (defendant) was formed to market jeans to larger women. Hogg Wyld decided to name its jeans “Lardashe,” as a play on the word “lardass,” one of its founder’s childhood nicknames. Hogg Wyld’s product was marked with the word Lardashe and a smiling pig on the seat of the pants. Jordache sued Hogg Wyld, alleging trademark infringement in violation of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051-1127. Jordache also alleged trademark dilution in violation of state law. The district court ruled against Jordache, finding no likelihood of confusion between the Jordache and Lardashe trademarks. Jordache appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.